FAQs:
Q: Under Prop 1, would there be a decrease in state land acquisition in order to prioritize the development of recreational facilities (trails, boat launches, parks, etc.)?
A: No. While the proposal does mandate a minimum of 25% of the NRTF to be spent on development, it does not change the amount that is required to be spent on land acquisition. Often, the NRTF Board does not exhaust all of its resources in a given year, and the current Trust Fund Board is dedicated to funding high quality land acquisition and conservation projects.
Q: What are the climate implications of this proposal?
A: Land acquisition is, and will continue to be, a critical component of combating climate change. This proposal doesn’t change the fact that high quality acquisition projects will be prioritized and funded by the Trust Fund Board, and doesn’t impact the board’s ability to do so. Michigan LCV is working with partners, the Trust Fund Board and the Michigan DNR to ensure that the preservation of nature, thriving and diverse ecosystems, climate change mitigation, and climate resiliency are more integrated and elevated in Michigan’s Public Land Strategy, DNR Programming, and the land the state prioritizes for acquisition.
Q: What would happen if Proposal 1 does not pass and the SPEF hits its cap?
A: In the short term, fewer outdoor recreational projects will be funded across the state, and at some undetermined point in the future the State Parks Endowment Fund (SPEF) will cap out at $800 million. When the SPEC reaches this cap, state oil and gas revenue would then be distributed to the state General Fund where lawmakers have discretion over where it is spent.
Q: Would Proposal 1 raise taxes or cost the state any money?
A: No. Proposal 1 would not lead to any net changes in state revenues. It would, however, change the way current, non-tax revenues are allocated.